Tuskaa.

Koulun kanssa joka ylityöllistää ja en pysty jäsentelee mitään asiaa sillee mieles, et voisin muistaa sen viel huomenna. Mie en kykene enää mustamaan sovittuja päivämääriä vaikka saniksille tai kirjoitelmien palautuksille ilman kalenteria. Sitten on kiva olla sillee kaikille "Sori, en taaskaan muistanu tämmösen olemassa oloa, kuulsotanko vähän tekopyhältä ja muuten vaan laiskurilta?" Mut siis mikään vaan ei enää jää mieleen!!!! Onks tää sit joku stressin aiheuttama juttu, mutkun ei miulla enää pitäs ola mitään! Mie en käy judossa, koska kadotin heti inspiksen ku sen sain. Motivaatio kouluun on kadonnu, en tee läksyjä ja partion ohjelmaa en oo saanu aikaseks suunnitella ja varailla kaikkee menoo. Mikä sit mättää???? No onnks se nyt sitten sen "hulda huolettomuuden" vuoks et kun en saa mitään aikaseks, stressaan ko pitäs panostaa kaikkeen.

Miun kaikki numerot on tippunu, varsinkin lemppa-aineideni eli kielten. Pitäs panostaa.
Olen ylipanoinen astmaatikko, miun pitäs kuntoilla enemmän. Panosta judoon ja liikuntaan.
Olet partion johtajana nyt yksin, et voi jättää ohjelmaa edes puoliksi toisen hoidettavaksi. Pitää panostaa ohjelman tekemiseen.

Lopulta niiiiiin vähän hommaa, kaiken sais hoidettuu parissa illassa: ohjelmaan jos saisin uhrattuu edes yks tai kaks iltaa, ongelma hoidettu. Judossa parikertaa viikossa, ei vie mistään muusta ko datailusta. Tekee vain hyvää ja jos joka päivä pikkasen lukisin. Edes pikkasen vähän sanoja tai grammaria, niin voisin kaikki neljä kieltä (mukaan luettuna siis äikkä) suorittaa hienosti kunnialla läpi.

MIKÄ ON ETTÄ ON TÄLLANEN LAISKAPASKA??? Mikä vittu voi olla tuolla korvien välissä niin vialla että tekeee ittelleen näin vitusti vaa hallaa?? Eikä siltikään, vaik sen tiedosta, tee mitään asialle. Voiko olla säälittävämpää näkyä??

Ei helvetti, meen ottaa lääkkeet ko ei hengittäminenkään enää onnistu, saatana.

ENA5 E-books – books of the future

Many people have started to read newspapers and books from online; from phones and computers. Or that is what has been told in the news lately. Some have been said that it could be possible that e-books will replace traditional books. Maybe that will happen after 20 years when there is no enough oxygen for us to breathe after we have cut down all the forests and we find paper disgusting because of technology’s high improvements but not yet

We use books in education to study and we read literature for fun. We can spend hours with a biology book for an exam or with an exciting thriller book at the evenings. But which is more comfortable to read for a long time: flashy pixels or books letters which stay still? It seems to me that people prefer paper because I haven’t seen many people reading e-books. The only time was at school, where a mother tongue class got to try iPads as studying tools. Half of my friends had ones and I can say my friends’ agreements on my side that it didn’t work well. I’m not going to explain fully why but one of the negative sides with iPads was that they had to read novels and other texts on them. It was ridiculous to read so much text on a screen so you will get more easily tired than when reading normal handouts. Maybe that’s one of the reasons why so many haven’t bought an e-book. Or only stubbornness and the desire to stick to the old ways are in the way.

Of course the internet is full of different stories, like fan fictions, which are read by many people but hay, does any normal youngster really read books or other stories anymore? They find movies faster way to get information. You don’t need to TUHLATA so much time and use your own imagination to create new worlds and characters, So in the end even e-books will disappear when people get tired of reading.

But anyhow, if you ask from me, I will stick to real books until I die. Of course if there are any books after some atom bomb have destroyed everything and every known book have changed into digital format.

ENA5 The King's Speech

The Kings’ Speech

The King’s Speech is a British historical drama film from 2010. The film was appreciated not only by the audience but also by critics. The King’s Speech tells us how the King George, who suffered from a very bad stammer, become the King and how his only help for his stammer was a man from side streets of London.

I loved The King’s Speech from a first second. After watching a bunch of Hollywood films this was a heaven with no unnecessary drama nor pointless exaggeration. All the historical events have been connected to each other perfectly and the whole big picture is credible.

The actors of the film won’t be ignored. Especially when the whole movie is full of well-known British actors. One of them is my own favorite, Collin Firth. He plays the role of the King George with the stammer problems. And he plays the role so well, that you could actually think he stammers in real life. Other notable actors are Helena Bonham carter (Harry Potter, Bellatrix) as George’s   wife Elizabeth and Geoffrey Rush as the Lionel Logue the speak therapist who helps George with his stammer. All their gestures, tune of voice, costumes and make up are just perfect.

The milieu around the characters brings the audience very realistically the time of heaviness and anguish. The houses, parks and streets were grey, cold and faded. For example the glorious government rooms versus Logue’s office, which was poorly decorated, wallpapers disperse with a decrepit atmosphere because of the neighborhood. The illness of the time was showed by little details which were added by the director, such like the “mist” on the streets of the London. The mist wasn’t actually mist but dust and dirty of the industry. On the time there weren’t any filters so all the burned coal smokes toxins float straight down to the streets.  But of course you don’t point put things like that.

Beyound all this is the filming itself and backgrounds music. These makes a big difference for Hollywood’s style where actors takes the biggest part of the picture and leaves not much of room for the background. On this film the actors are always somewhere else than in the middle of the screen so that the audience would add the backgrounds looks for creating the atmosphere of the situation. Music on the other hand have been made very simple or it won’t be heard so that when it is played it creates a stronger feelings to the scene. The big orchestral music is placed with a classic piano music and sometimes with few other instrumentals. The silence gives more attention to what actors speaks which is the main point of the film of course.

A stuttering King without any friend besides his family was a very touching sight to addition to all of this. And for me who stutter too (all thought not so badly) this story is even more touching. And little facts what happened later on was shown on the end of the film such as “They were friends for the rest of their lives” (The King and the speak therapist) made me cry eventually.